- Analysis by Cornell University’s Global Labor Institute and Schroders finds extreme heat and flooding are threatening key apparel production hubs
- Four countries vital for apparel production risk foregoing $65 billion in export earnings – equivalent to a 22% decline - and nearly 1 million new jobs due to slower growth
- Researchers analysed the climate-vulnerability of 32 apparel production hubs, findings show that exposure to heat and flooding risk is widespread
- Schroders states that investors need to engage with apparel companies and their stakeholders as adaptation measures aren’t prioritised enough in risk plans because the industry is focused on mitigation
- Researchers mapped the supply chain footprint of six global apparel brands across the four production centres – findings show workers and manufacturers for all six face productivity impacts from extreme heat and flooding
- Analysis calls for social protection mechanisms and climate adaptation finance that redistributes costs and risks away from apparel workers
Extreme heat and flooding are threatening key apparel hubs and will put over $65 billion worth of export earnings at risk across four key production centres by 2030.
That’s according to new research by Cornell University’s Global Labor Institute (GLI) and global asset management firm Schroders about the economic impact of climate breakdown – specifically, extreme heat and flooding - on apparel manufacturers and workers.
Researchers looked at the climate vulnerable apparel industries in Bangladesh, Cambodia, Pakistan and Vietnam, which collectively represent 18% of global apparel exports, house approximately 10,000 apparel and footwear factories and employ 10.6 million workers.
The results show that extreme heat and flooding will result in significant earnings and jobs foregone across all four countries, due to slower industry growth as a result of lower productivity. Compared with a ‘climate adaptive scenario’, the ‘high heat and flooding’ scenario shows a $65bn shortfall in projected earnings between 2025 and 2030, representing a 22% decline in export earnings. Similarly, the high heat and flooding scenario analysed shows that over 950,000 fewer new jobs would be created, representing a 7% decline. These projections rise significantly for 2050, representing a 68.6% in foregone export earnings and 8.64 million fewer jobs under the ‘high heat and flooding’ scenario.
Extreme flooding and heatwaves are already affecting these regions. In 2022, a third of Pakistan was underwater due to unprecedented flooding while earlier this year, Dhaka experienced an eleven day heatwave with temperatures reaching 40.2 degrees °C/ 104.3°F.
Jason Judd, Executive Director of Cornell GLI commented:
“Flooding and extreme heat pose significant risk to every constituency in global apparel production — workers, manufacturers, regulators, investor and brands themselves.
“But no one is factoring the on-the-ground costs of climate breakdown into their planning. The apparel industry and regulators have mostly framed their climate responses around mitigation issues—emissions, water usage, and recycled fabrics. They are ignoring the climate issues that are dramatically and directly affecting suppliers and their workers now. The Global North’s climate nightmares are already in evidence in Bangladesh, Pakistan, Cambodia and elsewhere. Life, let alone work, will become very difficult in these and many other hotspots that apparel brands and retailers depend on for production.”
Angus Bauer, Head of Sustainable Investment Research at Schroders commented:
“Rising heat stress and intense flooding represent $65 billion in would be export earnings and nearly one million forgone jobs for key apparel producing regions for 2030, increasing significantly for 2050. These issues pose material risks for brands, retailers and investors as they manifest either through productivity losses, stranded assets or both. This research highlights the urgent need for action. Investors must begin to engage with apparel companies and their stakeholders to ensure they start to measure and address the significant challenges of physical climate impacts on workers and business models. Furthermore, apparel companies must look to partner with suppliers, and work with peers, worker organisations and policy makers to design suitable adaptation strategies that consider the impact on workers. Adaptation planning could have positive returns on investment for the industry and is a critical addition to mitigation efforts.”
Beyond the four production centres
The analysis also notes that flooding and heat risks are a widespread issue for apparel production and are not limited to these four regions. Researchers analysed the climate-vulnerability of 32 apparel producing hubs, in terms of their exposure to extreme heat and humidity and riverine and coastal flooding. Several other production centres stood out for their vulnerability to both, most notably, Colombo (Sri Lanka), Managua (Nicaragua), Chittagong (Bangladesh), Port Louis (Mauritius), Yangon (Myanmar), Delhi, Bangkok and the Dongguan-Guangdong-Shenzhen regions of China.
Putting analysis to the test for six global apparel brands
Furthermore, the analysis also explores how these issues manifest for brands and retailers. Researchers mapped the supply chain footprint of six global apparel brands representing a wide variety of business models, across the four production centres.
Looking specifically at how the disruption translates to production, researchers looked at the productivity costs for heat and flooding impacts for one sample brand as an example. The analysis suggests that the estimated productivity headwind of heat stress and flood impacts in Ho Chi Minh and Phnom Penh alone could equate to five percent of group operating profits per year. The findings reiterate the need for brands to support adaptation measures.
The analysis notes that investment and transition finance strategies for the apparel industry must write new costs into their plans.
Jason Judd commented:
“Climate ‘loss and damage’ for manufacturers and workers are treated by brands as externalities — someone else’s problem. New Due Diligence rules in Europe shift some liability to brands and retailers can lead to bigger investments in adaptation – cooler workplaces, flood prevention and basic social protection systems. However, heat and flooding measures do not appear in initial drafts, due to the industry’s focus on mitigation. Key will be introducing set standards and protocols for working hours, effort levels, rest and hydration to be collected and reported daily, as well as enforcing meaningful sanctions for violations of standards.
“Workers need these investments now because extreme heat standards and flood protections are non-existent, or the systems are easy to game. And, in order to deal with the day-to-day costs of climate breakdown, workers need social protection systems in place and living wages. And ultimately, regulators and brands need to treat heat and flood events as health hazards.”
Higher Ground is available to download here.
